For existing clients, please rest assured that after a reasonable time
all case material in our possession will be confidentially disposed of.
For any client wanting their case material returned, please send
a postage paid return envelope to us and we will do so.
The original site, below, will be kept up for some time in his memory.
Voice (818) 609-1761 Fax (818) 609-9163
Dr. Shomer's Resume
The men on the left and right were picked out of police lineups by victims of rapes and robberies committed by the man in the middle.
The most common cause of wrongful convictions in our judicial system is mistaken identification.
Over more than 30 years, Dr. Shomer has testified as an expert witness in eyewitness identification in about 1,000 trials in 18 states, in Federal court, Superior court, and in military trials. Dr. Shomer has years of experience in the fields of observation, memory, stress, facial recall, cross-racial identification, and suggestibility as a member of the faculty of Harvard University, the Claremont Colleges, and UCLA. He has addressed the California State Bar Association and bar associations all over the country.
Fortunately for Mr. Kruska, his resemblance to the composite drawing of a slaying suspect only led to his being detained.
Walt Sweeny wasn't as lucky. He was put on trial for robbery. Dr. Shomer testified. The jury acquitted him of all charges.
"Dr. Shomer ... has taught numerous courses on the psychology of perception, memory, and recall, and has spoken and written frequently on such topics in both medical and legal settings. He is conversant with the scientific literature on the psychology of eyewitness identification, has done experimental research on the subject himself, and has published articles on that research. He has qualified as an expert psychological witness in more than two dozen state and federal trials. [Now over 250]. The People do not question the witness' qualifications.
...When an eyewitness identification of the defendant is a key element of the prosecution's case but is not substantially corroborated by evidence giving it independent reliability, and the defendant offers qualified expert testimony on specific psychological factors shown by the record that could have affected the accuracy of the identification but are not likely to be fully known to or understood by the jury, it will ordinarily be error to exclude that testimony.
...Not all psychologists, of course, have the special knowledge, experience, or training to qualify as experts on psychological factors affecting eyewitness identification
...In the case at bar, Dr. Shomer's relevant expertise was both demonstrated by defendant and impliedly conceded by the prosecution."
Click here for the full text of People v. McDonald.
Dr. Shomer's Resume